Air Canada passenger traffic up in Jan-2012, laod factor up

Air Canada reports (03-Feb-2012) the following traffic highlights in Jan-2012:

• Revenue passenger miles: +3.3% year-on-year;
  • Domestic: +3.8%;
  • US: +5.6%;
  • Europe: +1.5%;
  • Asia Pacific: +4.1%;
  • Latin America and other: +1.2%;
• Passenger load factor: 79.1%, +1.1 ppts;
  • Domestic: 77.7%, +1.2 ppts;
  • US: 75.3%, +0.8 ppt;
  • Europe: 72.8%, +0.3 ppt;
  • Asia Pacific: 88.4%, +0.9 ppt;
  • Latin America and other: 83.7%, +2.2 ppts. [more – original PR]

You may also be interested in the following articles...

• Air Canada and American Airlines: former Air Canada CEO on the 1980s UK-Canada bilateral dispute
  14-Dec-2011

  On 30-Nov-2011, CAPA published an article by Chris Lyle entitled American Airlines Goes Broke: Can a National Airline be allowed to Fail?

  Here former Air Canada President and CEO, Pierre Jeanniot, offers an alternative view of realpolitik and corrects the record on one of the more contentious bilateral disputes of all time - between Canada and the UK in the 1980s. The Canadian government has not always displayed the protectionist face it does today and in that confrontation, the UK government showed how it too could look after its own in a good old-fashioned tit-for-tat battle. One outcome was that Canada took the extreme step of withdrawing from the 1944 International Air Services Transit Agreement, thus removing British airlines' privileges to overfly Canadian territory en route to the US. Sanity eventually prevailed.

• American Airlines goes broke: Can a 'national' airline be allowed to fail?
  30-Nov-2011

  As American Airlines becomes the last major US airline to seek Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection, the issue of airline reconstruction and the basic role of airlines in the national economic and social equation remains a very real one for policy makers. In this timely article, Chris Lyle of Air Transport Economics gives a Canadian perspective.

  The vast majority of the world’s airlines are today privately owned. This includes most former “national” carriers which have been turned over by their governments to private ownership. And yet, in an era of globalization and transnationalism, when it comes to economic regulation, the “flag” carriers are still mollycoddled with a lean towards jingoism.

  There are two principal reasons why this happens. The first is provisions in national law and notably in the vast majority of bilateral air services agreements which preclude majority ownership and effective control of a carrier from one country by parties from another country.