
Snapshot
| Quick Links: | CAPA Hot Issues: Airport Non-Aero Activities Airport Construction | |
| Updates? | Email us! | |
Airport Finance & Charges
Airport charges are applied to airport users for the use of airport facilities. The way in which an airport makes money is basically divided into aeronautical and non-aeronautical (commercial) means. Aeronautical charges typically comprise landing (usually based on aircraft weight), parking, other infrastructure charges, navigation, passenger and freight handling (on a per-passenger or consignment basis), and fuel provision. Government taxes may also be included. Ultimately, these charges are paid, indirectly, by passengers and freight customers via the ticket price or freight forwarding fee.
Airport charging systems are in many instances imposed and governed by national authorities and can be ‘light’ or ‘heavy’ handed, or somewhere in-between. In a light-handed regime airports may be given carte blanche to set their own fees. At the other end of the scale they will be closely controlled. Some countries control prices at their main gateway airports only. Even where the airports concerned are privately owned, the charges have to comply with whatever regulatory parameters are set by the authorities.
Airports may apply ‘single’ or dual’ till principles. Under the single till principle all airport activities (aeronautical and commercial) are taken into consideration to determine the level of airport charges. Under the dual till principle, only aeronautical activities are taken into consideration; the airport's retail and other non-aeronautical revenue is not taken into account in reducing charges to airline users. Airport charges derived using the single till approach are therefore likely to be lower than they would under a dual till because of the "sharing" of profits generated by commercial activities. There are some variations on this theme, eg excluding parking revenues from the "till".
Charging systems can also work as management tools. By varying certain charges, airports for example can try to increase the use of airport infrastructure or reduce the environmental impact of aviation. In reports issued by CAPA in 2009 (e.g. in Airport Investor Monthly) it was clear how even neighbouring airports responded to the financial crisis by differing methods - in some cases reducing their fees (and/or introducing incentives) and in others by raising them (and/or curtailing incentives).
News Headlines

SCL Terminal Aereo Santiago mandates Corpbanca for Santiago Airport financing project
Bank of Ireland takes EUR1.1m from Galway Airport deposits
SkyBahamas fee costs increase 18% over three years
Fitch rates Cleveland Airport system revs 'A-'
Athens Airport outlines winter 2012 incentive aiming at the introduction of lower fares by airlines
Fitch upgrades Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands' Airport revs to 'B-'; outlook 'stable'
Older articles >>
CAPA Analysis
Spirit A320neo order allows carrier to replace costly A319 and expand further into South Ameirca
UK aviation policy, a royal mess
Tax hikes threaten US airline industry with billions in new costs
New US Department of Transportation airline consumer rules raise doubts
Jetstar-JAL LCC, "Jetstar Japan" to commence service by Dec-2012
Ryanair profits edge up but miss expectations on fuel blowout
What are US legacy airlines doing to improve their image and product – or don’t they care?
New LCC REDjet to launch operations in Caribbean
Republic Holdings continues 1Q loss
UK CAA steps up airport regulation and assesses airport market power
Older articles >>



